Miracles are becoming more common (apparently)

Broken arm restricts longer posts, so I’ll keep this brief. I saw this item on the BBC about how the Catholic Church is making it beatification bar higher. The Cardinal in charge is reported as ‘Stressing the need for a “true reputation for holiness” among sainthood candidates to be established before the process begins.’ .  Given that the internal test is supposed to be the rather harder ‘one or more than one miracle’, I’d have though that that was a much more useful test.

A Miracle is after all supposed to be, well miraculous – inexplicable by conventional science (see here).  But apparently, during the time of Pope John Paul II, more people were canonized than in the entire previous history of the church (1338 beatifications and 482 canonisations).  This could be admirable efficiency in sorting out pending reviews that had lasted decades or centuries, but what stands out to me is that in 27 years, the Catholic Church found solid evidence for at least 1820 miracles.  Even one that met a true skeptical scientist test would be pretty troubling, since it would force re-evaluation of the established view of the world.  1820 would shatter such a view of the world.  Or, just maybe, they weren’t Miracles, just unlikely but good things that happened, as statistics would indicate that they must.

This entry was posted in Musings. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Miracles are becoming more common (apparently)

  1. Jim Pye says:

    Just a small comment on your blog Greg. I have often wondered if the bar is higher (as in the high jump) to make things tougher, or lower (as in the Limbo). Now there’s real food for thought!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s